When people in D.C. have a physical health emergency, such as a heart attack, calling 911 generally results in a trained medic responding to the scene and providing care. But when people in D.C. call 911 for a mental health emergency, it’s generally a Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officer who responds. MPD training and policies make it more likely that officers will exacerbate mental health emergencies than ameliorate them. Indeed, mental health professionals report that officers in D.C. rarely respond to crises in medically appropriate ways. On many occasions, officers have used unnecessary force against people in crisis.

The District’s reliance on police as its default first responders for mental health emergencies is not only unfair and unsafe but also unlawful. Federal disability law prohibits local governments from depriving people with disabilities of equal access to emergency services. Deploying medics for physical health crises but police for mental health ones does just that. Bread for the City, a D.C. non-profit that serves under-resourced community members, sued the District to rectify this injustice, demanding parity between the emergency services provided to physical health and mental health emergencies.

The District moved to dismiss Bread's complaint; on September 10, 2024, the court denied that motion. It held that, based on the allegations in complaint, the District's emergency response program deprived people with mental health disabilities of meaningful access to its benefit of timely and effective emergency services. The case is currently in discovery.

Pro Bono Law Firm(s)

Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP

Date filed

July 6, 2023

Court

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Status

Open